Re: [PATCH 7/10] i386 sg: add support for chaining scatterlists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-i386/scatterlist.h b/include/asm-i386/scatterlist.h
> index d7e45a8..794b68c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-i386/scatterlist.h
> +++ b/include/asm-i386/scatterlist.h
> @@ -8,8 +8,11 @@ struct scatterlist {
>     unsigned int       offset;
>     dma_addr_t         dma_address;
>     unsigned int       length;
> +    struct scatterlist *next;
> };

BTW, the crypto layer's scatterlist already has a chaining mechanism
using the existing structure.  The only difference is that the chained
pointer is stored inside the 'struct page *' rather than a new pointer.
Its existence is flagged by a zero value in the length field.

Now I'm not super-religious about this but we should at least consider
whether forking out 4 bytes in every scatterlist member is worthwhile
investment when we can use 12 bytes at the end instead.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux