Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper

On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:10:09AM +0200, J??rn Engel wrote:
> 
> The remaining question is how to deal with kernel-only code that uses
> be64.  Convert that to __be64 as well?  Or introduce be64 in
> include/linix/types.h instead?

I say leave it alone for now, it's not that common :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/2] LogFS take two
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
    • From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
    • From: Jörn Engel <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 3/4] split usermodehelper setup from execution
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] AFS: Implement basic file write support
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]