yhlu wrote: > On 5/8/07, Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]> wrote: >> You might try a git-bisect, or if it is just these patches >> walking through them one-by-one. > > f82af20e1a028e16b9bb11da081fa1148d40fa6a is first bad commit > commit f82af20e1a028e16b9bb11da081fa1148d40fa6a > Author: Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]> > Date: Wed May 2 19:27:19 2007 +0200 > > [PATCH] x86-64: ignore vgacon if hardware not present > > Avoid trying to set up vgacon if there's no vga hardware present. > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> > Cc: Alan <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Interesting. I haven't really been following this thread, but doesn't it mean something isn't being initialized properly if this patch makes a difference? J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- References:
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: yhlu <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: yhlu <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: yhlu <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- From: yhlu <[email protected]>
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 3/4] split usermodehelper setup from execution
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] synclink_gt add compat_ioctl
- Previous by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Next by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage
- Index(es):
 |