Re: [PATCH] Use tty_schedule in VT code.

[Paul Fulghum <paulkf@microgate.com>]

On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 21:10 +0100, James Simmons wrote:
> 
> This patch has the VT subsystem use tty_schedule_flip instead of 
> con_schedule_flip. There are two ways we can approach this. We can
> do the below path or extend tty_schedule_flip to accept a time field.
> Comments welcomed.

This looks reasonable.

I don't think a time field is necessary. In fact, I think the
scheduled_delayed_work() in tty_schedule_flip() should use a
time of 0 just like con_schedule_flip().

As the tty flip buffer code has evolved, that delay value of 1
was carried along. It may have had some historical purpose, but
I can't figure it out and it appears to have no use currently.

It would be better for performance to process the receive data
as soon as possible (delay value of 0).


--
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/