RE: [PATCH Resend] - SN: validate smp_affinity mask on intr redirect

> It had a dopey little bug:
>
> -#define is_affinity_mask_valid() 1
> +#define is_affinity_mask_valid(val) 1

That would fix warnings on non-ia64 systems (which is
a step in the right direction).  But on ia64 I have
the

#define is_affinity_mask_valid is_affinity_mask_valid

in play at that point, so I have a real function call
which doesn't have an in-scope declaration, so I get:

kernel/irq/proc.c:49: warning: implicit declaration of function `is_affinity_mask_valid'

-Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH Resend] - SN: validate smp_affinity mask on intr redirect
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH Resend] - SN: validate smp_affinity mask on intr redirect
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/2] smaps: only define clear_refs for CONFIG_MMU
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] drivers/macintosh: remove default y from Kconfig (was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH Resend] - SN: validate smp_affinity mask on intr redirect
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH Resend] - SN: validate smp_affinity mask on intr redirect
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]