Re: sleeping function called from invalid context at block/cfq-iosched.c (Was: Re: 2.6.21-mm1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 7 May 2007 22:31:32 -0700 William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, 07 May 2007 21:31:06 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I'm using wli's 8k
> >> stack + irq stack patches with good success though.
> 
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:24:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > wlis are handy.
> 
> I think Andi's handling the mergework on those patches, but I'll check
> in to see if I should rediff vs. -mm or what if you want them.
> 
> Andi, what's the verdict on those stack patches?
> 

Whoa. The verdict is usually "don't use so much stack".

Do we know what has gone wrong here?

Last week Jens said he was picking up the ancient
md-dm-reduce-stack-usage-with-stacked-block-devices.patch, but he doesn't
seem to have done so yet.

XFS is frequently implicated.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux