Re: [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error

Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote:

> It makes little or no sense to be forcing attributes like 'const' in a
> typedef. That is basically stating that it is inconceivable to use
> anything else. Clearly not the case here...

Yeah.  I think that there shouldn't be a typedef.  There's no real need for
it.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • 2.6.21-mm1
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error
    • From: David Howells <[email protected]>
  • Re: [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: JBD: ext2online wants too many credits (744 > 256)
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
• Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.21-mm1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]