Re: [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error

Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote:

> It makes little or no sense to be forcing attributes like 'const' in a
> typedef. That is basically stating that it is inconceivable to use
> anything else. Clearly not the case here...

Yeah.  I think that there shouldn't be a typedef.  There's no real need for
it.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error
  - From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- 2.6.21-mm1
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: JBD: ext2online wants too many credits (744 > 256)
Next by Date: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v8
Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] fix fs/nfs/nfsroot.c compile error
Next by thread: Re: 2.6.21-mm1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]