Re: [BUG] cpu-hotplug: Can't offline the CPU with naughty realtime processes

[Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>]

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:10:05PM +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I found a bug on 2.6.21 cpu-hotplug code.
> 
> When process A on CPU0 try to offline the CPU1 on which the process B,
> realtime process (its task->policy == SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR) running
> without sleep or yield, both CPU0 and CPU1 get hang. 

One could argue that this can be tackled in userspace by SIGSTOPping all
such real-time threads before hotplugging CPUs and SIGCONTing them after
hotplug is complete.

Would this simple solution be acceptable?

Otherwise, we need to have:

1.  __stop_machine_run() set the priority/policy of the first kthread
   (do_stop) to MAX_RT_PRIO-1/SCHED_FIFO *before* waking it up

2. scheduler gives some API to add a thread to /front/ of runqueue
   (enqueue_task_head is internal to sched.c) and use that API in
   activating all stop_machine related threads.

> It's because of the following code on __stop_machine_run().
> 
> struct task_struct *__stop_machine_run(int (*fn)(void *), void *data,
> 				       unsigned int cpu)
> {
> 	...
> 	p = kthread_create(do_stop, &smdata, "kstopmachine");
> 	if (!IS_ERR(p)) {
> 		kthread_bind(p, cpu);
> 		wake_up_process(p);
> 		wait_for_completion(&smdata.done);
> 	}
> 	...
> }
> 
> kstopmachine is created, bound to the CPU1, and woken up here, but
> this process can't start to run because reschedule doesn't occur on
> CPU1. Hence CPU0 also be able to run because it's waiting completion
> of CPU1's offline work.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/