On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 03:02 -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I just thought I would mention this, because it is certainly on my
> mind. I can't help
> wondering if other folks are also concerned about this. The thing is,
> why don't you
> just send your patches to Con who got this whole ball rolling and did a bunch of
> great work, proving beyond any reasonable doubt that he is capable of
> maintaining
> this subsystem, whatever algorithm is finally adopted? Are you worried that Con
> might steal your thunder? That somehow the scheduler is yours alone? That you
> might be perceived as less of a genius if somebody else gets credit
> for their good
> work? NIH?
>
> My perception is that you barged in to take over just when Con got things moving
> after the scheduler sat and rotted for several years. If that is in
> any way accurate,
> then shame on you.
Nice flame bait. There's a hell of a lot I could say about this, but
I'll just leave it.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
