Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 03:39:40PM +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> > > secondary notion too, as that is common.  It would be generic.
> > >
> > > Or maybe I just didn't get the idea behind the "type" attribute :-)
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate if these were documented in the text file.
> >
> > I think I got the start point of confusion. It's indeed bad to call such
> > power supply type as AC. Maybe I should it rename to ADAPTER? Or WALL?
> 
>  or MAINS?

Philipp, much thanks! MAINS indeed feels perfect for that.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: [email protected]
backup email: [email protected]
irc://irc.freenode.org/bd2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux