> Nevermind, it does not look like it gets any cooler at lower frequencies, > so it's a nobrainer to run it at the default 733. Well. You have very good CPU - 4,4W typical and 6,0W is a factory maximum. My is eating 6,78W while *sleeping* at 1GHz or about 5W while *sleeping* at 533MHz. > Jan Rafał ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wicie, rozumicie.... Zobacz >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1a74 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- References:
- cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: David Johnson <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Rafał Bilski <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Rafał Bilski <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Rafał Bilski <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Rafał Bilski <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Rafał Bilski <[email protected]>
- Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- cpufreq longhaul locks up
- Prev by Date: Re: unprivileged mount problems: device permissions ignored, mount sharing
- Next by Date: [ANNOUNCE] kvm-22 release
- Previous by thread: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- Next by thread: Re: cpufreq longhaul locks up
- Index(es):
 |