Hi Tom,
On 5/6/07, Tom Zanussi <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
relay doesn't need to use schedule_delayed_work() for waking readers
when a simple timer will do.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <[email protected]>
[...]
diff --git a/include/linux/relay.h b/include/linux/relay.h
index 759a0f9..cac0732 100644
--- a/include/linux/relay.h
+++ b/include/linux/relay.h
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct rchan_buf
size_t subbufs_consumed; /* count of sub-buffers consumed */
struct rchan *chan; /* associated channel */
wait_queue_head_t read_wait; /* reader wait queue */
- struct delayed_work wake_readers; /* reader wake-up work struct */
+ struct timer_list timer; /* reader wake-up timer */
struct dentry *dentry; /* channel file dentry */
struct kref kref; /* channel buffer refcount */
struct page **page_array; /* array of current buffer pages */
I suspect you could now safely get rid of the "#include
<linux/wait.h>" at the top of relay.h too. And although timer.h comes
via #include <linux/sched.h>, you might want to do that explicitly
too.
Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
