Re: 2.6.21-mm1: many processes end up in D state

[Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>]

On Sat, 05 May 2007 17:30:51 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> >> I.e. no freezing of ports...
> > 
> > Your patch to delete the 'return 1;' on error is correct,
> > and makes the code match exactly the behaviour of previous
> > versions of sata_promise, except for the additional error
> > decoding.
> > 
> > ahci and sata_sil24 do the return in this situation. I don't
> > yet understand why they can get away with it while sata_promise
> > cannot, but for now the return should be removed.
> 
> That's because sata_sil24 and ahci call either ata_port_abort() or
> ata_port_freeze() prior to finishing error_intr routine.  Both functions
> abort all in-flight command and schedule EH.

Ah. Thanks, that clarifies things.

Jiri: please test the patch below instead. That is, revert to
the original code _with_ the 'return 1;', and then add this
patch to it. It should have pretty much the same effect as
removing the 'return 1;', however calling ata_port_abort()
is more in line with libata's new-style error handling.

/Mikael

--- linux-2.6.21-mm1/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c.~1~	2007-05-05 22:24:41.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21-mm1/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c	2007-05-05 22:25:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -653,6 +653,8 @@ static void pdc_error_intr(struct ata_po
 	qc->err_mask |= ac_err_mask;
 
 	pdc_reset_port(ap);
+
+	ata_port_abort(ap);
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int pdc_host_intr( struct ata_port *ap,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/