Re: [RFC 1/3] SLUB: slab_ops instead of constructors / destructors

On Sat, 5 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> For consistency with other operations structures, can we make this
> struct kmem_cache_operations or kmem_cache_ops, please?

Ok.
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC 0/3] Slab Defrag / Slab Targeted Reclaim and general Slab API changes
  - From: [email protected]
- [RFC 1/3] SLUB: slab_ops instead of constructors / destructors
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: [RFC 1/3] SLUB: slab_ops instead of constructors / destructors
  - From: "Pekka Enberg" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC 1/3] SLUB: slab_ops instead of constructors / destructors
Next by Date: Re: Ext3 vs NTFS performance
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC 1/3] SLUB: slab_ops instead of constructors / destructors
Next by thread: Re: [RFC 1/3] SLUB: slab_ops instead of constructors / destructors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]