Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "WANG Cong" <[email protected]>, "la deng" <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP
From: "la deng" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:29:33 +0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Analysis,giveing c the penalty of 1/17 speed as normal

What's you think about it?

Thanks

I think I mean   the "side effect" of C
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP
  - From: "la deng" <[email protected]>
- Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP
  - From: "la deng" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [git pull] Input patches for 2.6.20
Next by Date: Re: [patch 3/3] clockevents: Fix resume logic
Previous by thread: Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP
Next by thread: [SOLVED] Serial buffer corruption [was Re: FTDI usb-serial possible bug]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux