On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:57:21AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Ah. The patch affects security code, but it doesn't actually address any
> > insecurity. I didn't think it was needed for -stable?
>
> I would not recommend it for -stable.
> It is an ABI change for the case of a security refusal.
ABI changes are not a problem for -stable, so don't let that stop anyone
:)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
