Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:Again, slab has no way of actually estimating how many pages you need for a given number of objects. So we end up calculating some upper bound which doesn't belong in mm/slab.c. I am perfectly okay with:It can give a worst case number and that is what he wants.
Sure. But he can calculate that elsewhere instead of bringing it in mm/slab.c where it's no use for anyone else...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- References:
- [PATCH 00/40] Swap over Networked storage -v12
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/40] Swap over Networked storage -v12
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
- Index(es):
 |