RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark

On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 11:10 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2007, Tim Chen wrote:
> 
> > A side note is that for my tests, I bound the netserver and client to
> > separate cpu core on different sockets in my tests, to make sure that
> > the server and client do not share the same cache.  
> 
> Ahhh... You have some scripts that you run. Care to share?

I do

taskset -c 1 netserver

and

taskset -c 2 netperf  -t TCP_STREAM -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -- -s 57344 -S
57344 -m 4096

> 
> This is no NUMA syste? Two processors in an SMP system?

Yes, it is a SMP system with 2 socket.  Each socket has 4 cores.

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark
    • From: "Chen, Tim C" <[email protected]>
  • RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark
    • From: Tim Chen <[email protected]>
  • RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Replace paravirt_probe with "platform type" boot header field
• Previous by thread: RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark
• Next by thread: RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]