Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Right after the segments loads we have: > leal 0x40(%esi), %esp > call 1f > 1: popl %ebp > subl $1b, %ebp > > That uses %ss and %ds. Can we use a segment override on a call > instruction? > Nope. As I said, not having %ss and %es set up is not realistic for anything other than switching to our own GDT. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC PATCH 1/3] Replace paravirt_probe with "platform type" boot header field
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [RFC PATCH 2/3] lguest: Boot with virtual == physical to get closer to native Linux.
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt
- From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [RFC PATCH 1/3] Replace paravirt_probe with "platform type" boot header field
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/3] UML - hostfs style fixes
- Next by Date: Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] boot bzImages under paravirt
- Index(es):
 |