Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)

On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:10:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:31:43PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
[...]
> Should line 2563 be a spin_lock_irqsave instead along with the
> appropriate unluck later?
IIRC, when you enable lockdep, it will complain about spinlocks used in
an invalid context.

Regards,
Frederik
> 
> --
> Len Sorensen
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)

• References:
  • Strange soft lockup detected message
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
  • Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6.20.1] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Revert "[PATCH] paravirt: Add startup infrastructure for paravirtualization"
• Previous by thread: Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)
• Next by thread: Re: Strange soft lockup detected message (looks like spin_lock bug in pcnet32)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]