Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP

On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>On May 4 2007 19:00, la deng wrote:
>>
>> What's you think about it?

C gives you the power to control nearly everything. You can, of course, control the registers via inserting assembly code. That's not the fault of C.

>
>I think the discussion should stop right here, because the kernel
>will not be transformed into C++ anytime soon.
>
>
>Jan

OK. Stop here.

Regards!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP
    • From: "la deng" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP
    • From: "la deng" <[email protected]>
  • Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP
    • From: "la deng" <[email protected]>
  • Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ext3 vs NTFS performance
• Next by Date: [PATCH] acpi,msi-laptop: Fall back to EC polling mode for MSI laptop specific EC commands
• Previous by thread: Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP
• Next by thread: Re: c 's OOP in VFS vs c++'s OOP
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]