Re: [PATCH 1/5] Power Management: use mutexes instead of semaphores

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 4 May 2007 09:08:40 +0200 Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]> wrote:

> > I note that none of these patches added a #include <linux/mutex.h>.  Each C
> > file which uses mutexes should do that, rather than relying upon accidental
> > nested includes.  I hope you're checking for that.
> 
> initially i added the include line (i think at least one patch still
> contains it), but then i realized that in most cases the original code
> doesn't include semaphore.h and i (mis-)interpreted that it should be
> handled the same way (relying upon nested includes) for mutexes. 
> 
> do you want me to send you a version of the patches containing the
> include?

erm, is OK, I'll make the changes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux