Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers

On Wednesday 02 May 2007 21:11, Russell King wrote:
> > > Is there a maintainer for this "drivers/mfd" directory?
> >
> > rmk
>
> I wouldn't go that far.  There's no real infrastructure there
> to maintain, so I'd actually say that the directory was
> maintainerless.  However, I'll own up to the UCB/MCP drivers
> in there.

So perhaps you could answer is you feel that these ADC & DAC chrdev device 
drivers would fit into this drivers/mfd directory, or are better suited for 
the drivers/char directory?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
    • From: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
  • Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
    • From: Robert Schwebel <[email protected]>
  • Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fallocate() implementation in i86, x86_64 and powerpc
• Next by Date: Re: + per-cpuset-hugetlb-accounting-and-administration.patch added to -mm tree
• Previous by thread: Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
• Next by thread: Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]