Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers

On Wednesday 02 May 2007 21:11, Russell King wrote:
> > > Is there a maintainer for this "drivers/mfd" directory?
> >
> > rmk
>
> I wouldn't go that far.  There's no real infrastructure there
> to maintain, so I'd actually say that the directory was
> maintainerless.  However, I'll own up to the UCB/MCP drivers
> in there.

So perhaps you could answer is you feel that these ADC & DAC chrdev device 
drivers would fit into this drivers/mfd directory, or are better suited for 
the drivers/char directory?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
  - From: Russell King <[email protected]>

References:
- Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
  - From: Stefan Roese <[email protected]>
- Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
  - From: Robert Schwebel <[email protected]>
- Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
  - From: Russell King <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] fallocate() implementation in i86, x86_64 and powerpc
Next by Date: Re: + per-cpuset-hugetlb-accounting-and-administration.patch added to -mm tree
Previous by thread: Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
Next by thread: Re: Correct location for ADC/DAC drivers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]