On Thu, 3 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2007 20:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Performance tests show a slight improvements in netperf (not a
> > strong case for a performance improvement but removing the
> > constructor has definitely no negative impact so why keep
> > this around?).
> >
> > TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to localhost (127.0.0.1) port 0 AF_INET
> > Recv Send Send
> > Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> > Size Size Size Time Throughput
> > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
> >
> > Before:
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6026.04
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 5992.17
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6071.23
> >
> > After:
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6090.20
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.01 6078.3
> > 87380 16384 16384 10.00 6013.52
>
> How could a filesystem change affect networking performance?
>
> The change looks nice, but I'd microbenchmark it with a write-to-ext2-on-ramdisk
> or something like that.
Hmmmm.. I was told in another thread that this is the most frequently used
slab for this benchmark ...... Just accepted that as true.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]