Re: Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring

On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 16:30 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Glen Turner wrote:
> 
> > The question is, how can a process with no relationship to another
> > process detect that process unexpectedly dying?  If named goes
> > away to a better place, we want to shut down the interface
> > which causes Quagga to inject the anycast route.

> We did something similar where arbitrary processes can register to be 
> sent an arbitrary signal when the state of other processes change.

What about something like inotify, but for processes?  That would be
cool...

- DML

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
    • From: Glen Turner <[email protected]>
  • Re: Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
    • From: "Chris Friesen" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Regression with SLUB on Netperf and Volanomark
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] tty add compat_ioctl
• Previous by thread: Re: Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
• Next by thread: Re: Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]