> > +static unsigned char rep_scancode;
> > +static struct timer_list atakeyb_rep_timer = {
> > + .function = atakeyb_rep,
> > +};
>
> Is there a problem with repeat implementation in input core that
> requres custom-made repeater here?
Apparently not - the homebrew repeater has not been active pretty much
since I started to work on Atari in 2.6... time to kill that code.
> > +
> > + // handle_scancode(scancode, !break_flag);
>
> The code looks a bit dirty (old code commented out, C++ style comments).
You got that right.
> > +
> > +
> > +int atari_kbdrate(struct kbd_repeat *k)
> > +{
> > + if (k->delay > 0) {
> > + /* convert from msec to jiffies */
> > + key_repeat_delay = (k->delay * HZ + 500) / 1000;
>
> If this is really needed - msecs_to_jiffies().
That has to go as well (together with the repeater).
>
> >
> > +config KEYBOARD_ATARI
> > + tristate "Atari keyboard"
> > + depends on ATARI
> > + select ATARI_KBD_CORE
> > + help
> > + Say Y here if you are running Linux on any Atari and have a keyboard
> > + attached.
> > +
> > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> > + module will be called atakbd.
>
> Can we spell it out: atarikbd or atari_kbd?
Could do that, yes. Christoph suggested to fold everythig into atakeyb.c
so modularization would go away here.
>
> > +
> > + if (!(atakbd_dev = input_allocate_device()))
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + // need to init core driver if not already done so
> > + if (atari_keyb_init())
>
> Memory leak
How so? If the core has been initialized already this will just return ...
> > + for (i = 1; i < 0x72; i++) {
> > + atakbd_keycode[i] = i;
> > + set_bit(atakbd_keycode[i], atakbd_dev->keybit);
>
> It looks like this driver is not using standard input event codes. If
> Roman does not want to adjust keymaps on Amiga and Atari that should
> be handled in legacy keyboard driver (drivers/char/keyboard.c). As it
> is programs using /dev/input/eventX have no chance of working.
The translation map should not have been overwritten like above, is that
what you mean?
My original patch didn't have that bit; scancodes were translated to
input keycodes using atakbd_keycode[scancode] instead. I'll have that
reverted...
> > + }
> > +
> > + input_register_device(atakbd_dev);
>
> Error handling.
Oops.
>
> > +
> > +static int mouse_threshold[2] = {2,2};
> > +
> > +#ifdef __MODULE__
> > +MODULE_PARM(mouse_threshold, "2i");
>
> MODULE_PARM is so 20th century...
Never tested, sorry.
> > +
> > +static int atamouse_open(struct input_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > + if (atamouse_used++)
> > + return 0;
>
> No need to count, input core takes care of this.
OK; I'll delete this.
> > +
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "input: %s at keyboard ACIA\n", atamouse_dev->name);
>
> Input core already logs every input device registered, do we need to
> repeat it in the driver?
Not really ... I'll merge atakeyb.c, atakbd.c and atamouse.c and send a
new patch to Geert.
Thanks,
Michael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]