Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v7

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Ting Yang <tingy@cs.umass.edu> wrote:

> +    s64 __delta = curr->fair_key - p->fair_key;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Take scheduling granularity into account - do not
> +     * preempt the current task unless the best task has
> +     * a larger than sched_granularity fairness advantage:
> +     */
> +    if (__delta > niced_granularity(rq, curr, granularity))
> +        resched_task(curr);
> +}
> 
> This code actually now says, the difference of fair_key needed to 
> preempt the current task is amplified by a facto of its weigh (in Al 
> Boldi's example 32). However, the weighted task already advance its 
> p->fair_key by its weight, (also 32 here). The combination of them 
> becomes quadratic!

it's not quadratic in terms of CPU share: the first factor impacts the 
CPU share, the second factor impacts the granularity. This means that 
reniced workloads will be preempted in a more finegrained way - but 
otherwise there's _no_ quadratic effect for CPU time - which is a 
completely separate metric. Remember: there are no timeslices in CFS, so 
a task can be preempted any number of times without being at a 
disadvantage.

>     Besides this quadratic effect, another minor issue amplified this 
> a little bit further: p->wait_runtime accumulated before. [...]

actually, this 'minor issue' was the main issue that caused the bug ;-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/