Re: [PATCH] [16/34] i386: fix mtrr sections

Andi Kleen wrote:

As Andy already submitted it to Linus with http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/2/346
we may have to create a patch which reverts this patch.

Ok thanks for the explanation. I will queue a revert patch

I'm also planning to add some function headers to the MTRR functions
and also fix the existing and upcoming function headers to be complant
to kernel-doc.

Thanks

-Andi

Thanks from me also.

--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] [0/34] x86 candidate patches for review VI: MTRR, APIC, more paravirt, misc
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [16/34] i386: fix mtrr sections
    • From: Bernhard Kaindl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [16/34] i386: fix mtrr sections
    • From: Bernhard Kaindl <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [16/34] i386: fix mtrr sections
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [16/34] i386: fix mtrr sections
• Next by thread: [PATCH] [19/34] x86_64: move __vgetcpu_mode & __jiffies to the vsyscall_2 zone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]