Why ssse3?

Note the extra 's'.  We use "sse" and "sse2", but "ssse3".  I assume
it's a typo.


Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>

--- arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c	2007-02-15 11:21:18.000000000 -0800
+++ arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c-new	2007-05-02 15:31:17.000000000 -0700
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@

 		/* Intel-defined (#2) */
 		"pni", NULL, NULL, "monitor", "ds_cpl", "vmx", "smx", "est",
-		"tm2", "ssse3", "cid", NULL, NULL, "cx16", "xtpr", NULL,
+		"tm2", "sse3", "cid", NULL, NULL, "cx16", "xtpr", NULL,
 		NULL, NULL, "dca", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, "popcnt",
 		NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,


-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why ssse3?
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Why ssse3?
    • From: Ismail Dönmez <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.21-git4 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
• Next by Date: Re: coretemp - take3
• Previous by thread: Mysterious RTC hangs on x86_64 - fixed, sort of
• Next by thread: Re: Why ssse3?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]