Re: [PATCH] tty add compat_ioctl method

On Thursday 03 May 2007, Paul Fulghum wrote:
> 
> > declarations should never be hidden inside of an #ifdef. If you want to be
> > extra clever here, you can do
> 
> OK, I have no problem with that.
> A declaration without implementation won't generate a warning?

You only get a warning for static declarations without an implementation,
not for globals.

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • compat_ioctl question
    • From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] tty add compat_ioctl method
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] tty add compat_ioctl method
    • From: Paul Fulghum <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm2 crash: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1)
• Next by Date: Re: [BUG] 2.6.21: Kernel won't boot with either/both of CONFIG_NO_HZ, CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] tty add compat_ioctl method
• Next by thread: Re: compat_ioctl question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]