Re: "partical" kthread conversion

Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes:

> I gave up and dropped them all - let's have another run at it.  Possibly
> some of them were complete and didn't deserve dropping, in which case you
> can send them straight back at me.

Sounds like a plan.

Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • "partical" kthread conversion
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: "partical" kthread conversion
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: "partical" kthread conversion
    • From: Dean Nelson <[email protected]>
  • Re: "partical" kthread conversion
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: "partical" kthread conversion
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ext3 vs NTFS performance
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
• Previous by thread: Re: "partical" kthread conversion
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans -- vm bugfixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]