On May 2 2007 16:28, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > - Check for all of (u)int{8,16,32,64}_t I strongly disagree. These should be allowed, for they are (I think) C99. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- checkpatch, a patch checking script.
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: checkpatch, a patch checking script.
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
- Prev by Date: Re: arch/i386/boot rewrite, and all the hard-coded video cards
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR
- Previous by thread: Re: checkpatch, a patch checking script.
- Next by thread: Re: checkpatch, a patch checking script.
- Index(es):