Re: [PATCH 4/6] UML - free() wrapper should call libc free

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:49:01PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I want to get rid of PG_reserved eventually. Is it possible to use PG_arch_1
> for this?

Yup.

Andrew - Feel free to drop this or just sit on it until I send a
replacement.  Whichever is easier.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 4/6] UML - free() wrapper should call libc free
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 4/6] UML - free() wrapper should call libc free
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH 00/16] raid acceleration and asynchronous offload api for 2.6.22
• Next by Date: do_tty_write() can block even with O_NONBLOCK?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/6] UML - free() wrapper should call libc free
• Next by thread: [PATCH 5/6] UML - Network and pcap cleanup
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]