Re: [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused__

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:53:52PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>On Wed, 2 May 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:28:18PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>> > +#define __attribute_unused__		__attribute__((unused))
>> 
>> Suggest __unused which is shorter and looks compiler-neutral.
>> 
>
>So you would also suggest renaming __attribute_used__ and all 48 of its 
>uses to __used?

I suggest. ;-p 
'__attribute_unused__' is really long. I would prefer '__attribute__((unused))', since your macro doesn't let me type much less characters.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused__
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused__
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused__
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused__
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] edd: Switch to refcounting PCI APIs
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused__
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 01/10] compiler: define __attribute_unused__
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]