On Tue, 1 May 2007 22:53:52 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:28:18PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > > +#define __attribute_unused__ __attribute__((unused))
> >
> > Suggest __unused which is shorter and looks compiler-neutral.
> >
>
> So you would also suggest renaming __attribute_used__ and all 48 of its
> uses to __used?
Or __needed or __unneeded. None of them mean much to me and I'd be forever
going back to the definition to work out what was intended.
We're still in search of a name, IMO. But once we have it, yeah, we should
update all present users. We can do that over time: retain the old and new
definitions for a while.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
