Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 3/9] Containers (V9): Add tasks file interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/1/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]> wrote:

For the CPU controller I was working on, (a fast access to) such a list would
have been valuable. Basically each task has a weight associated with it
(p->load_weight) which is made to depend upon its class limit. Whenever
the class limit changes, we need to go and change all its member task's
->load_weight value.

If you don't maintain the per-container task list, I guess I could still
work around it, by either:

        - Walk the task table and find relevant members

That doesn't seem like a terrible solution to me, unless you expect
the class limit to be changing incredibly frequently.

If we had multiple subsystems that needed to walk the container member
list on a fast-path operation (e.g. to make a scheduling decision)
that would be a good reason to maintain such a list.

          perhaps
        - Move p->load_weight to a class structure

Sounds like a good idea if you can do it - but if it's per-process,
how would it fit in the class structure?

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux