OOn Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:03:12 +0400, "Edward Shishkin"
<[email protected]> said:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> >
> >As I understand it, the default Reiser4 DOES NOT USE any compression at
> >all, not even tail compression,
> >
>
> ^tail compression^tail conversion
> Reiser4 does use tail conversion by default.
>
> > but saves space by eliminating block
> >alignment wastage (tail compression is an option).
> >
> >So lets LOSE the statistics that involve compression. The results now
> >look like this:
> >
> >.-------------------------.
> >| FILESYSTEM | TIME |DISK |
> >| TYPE |(secs)|USAGE|
> >.-------------------------.
> >|REISER4 | 3462 | 692 |
> >|EXT2 | 4092 | 816 |
> >|JFS | 4225 | 806 |
> >|EXT4 | 4408 | 816 |
> >|EXT3 | 4421 | 816 |
> >|XFS | 4625 | 779 |
> >|REISER3 | 6178 | 793 |
> >|FAT32 |12342 | 988 |
> >|NTFS-3g |10414 | 772 |
> >.-------------------------.
> >
> >These results are still EXTREMELY GOOD for REISER4.
> >
> >
>
> Everything is not so simple in the science of testing..
> Would you please change direction of your activity to stressing
> instead of benchmarking? Caught oopses would have great value..
> OK?
>
> Regards,
> Edward.
>
Tail conversion is NOT compression,....
So what exactly is your point?
By "tail compression" I mean plugin ctail40, but since I was never able
to get it to work, maybe its not tail compression at all.
--
[email protected]
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - mmm... Fastmail...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
