Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments

[ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)]

David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes:

> John Anthony Kazos Jr. <jakj@j-a-k-j.com> wrote:
>
>> 	if (veryverylengthycondition1
>> 		&& smallcond2
>> 		&& (conditionnumber3a
>> 			|| condition3b)) {
>> 		...
>> 	}
>> 
>> Clear, crisp, and 80-wide. I also like how the logical operator on the 
>> following line is indented slightly into the condition of the previous 
>> line.
>
> The brain works better when associated things are lined up, so:
>
> 	if (veryverylengthycondition1 &&
> 	    smallcond2 &&
> 	    (conditionnumber3a ||
> 	     condition3b)) {
>
> is better as it gives a visual clue to association.

Not lining up with the code following the if statement is also
a plus.  Because it clearly delineates the conditions from the code.

Of course in many cases conditions this complex are candidates for

if (!condition1)
	continue;
if (!condition2)
	continue;
if (!condition3a && !condition3b)
	continue;

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/