* Greg KH ([email protected]) wrote: > And is this really a problem? The whole goal of the -stable tree was to > accomidate the users who relied on kernel.org kernels, and wanted > bugfixes and security updates. It was not for new features or new > hardware support. > > If people feel we should revisit this goal, then that's fine, and I have > no objection to that. But until then, I think the rules that we have > had in place for over the past 2 years should still remain in affect. I have to agree. I went back through my mbox and found vanishingly few pci_id update patches. So it's not clear there's even a big issue. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- References:
- 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] mmconfig: Some additional chipset register values validation.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] zero_user_page uses in fs/buffer.c and fs/libfs.c
- Previous by thread: Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- Next by thread: Re: [stable] to something appropriate (was Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans)
- Index(es):