Re: [PATCH 1/9] Containers (V9): Basic container framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[email protected] wrote:
This patch adds the main containers framework - the container
filesystem, and the basic structures for tracking membership and
associating subsystem state objects to tasks.

[snip]

+*** notify_on_release is disabled in the current patch set. It may be
+*** reactivated in a future patch in a less-intrusive manner
+

Won't this break user space tools for cpusets?

[snip]

+See kernel/container.c for more details.
+
+Subsystems can take/release the container_mutex via the functions
+container_lock()/container_unlock(), and can
+take/release the callback_mutex via the functions
+container_lock()/container_unlock().
+

Hmm.. looks like a documentation error. Both mutex's are obtained through
container_lock/container_unlock ?

+Accessing a task's container pointer may be done in the following ways:
+- while holding container_mutex
+- while holding the task's alloc_lock (via task_lock())
+- inside an rcu_read_lock() section via rcu_dereference()
+

container_mutex() and task_lock() can be used for changing the pointer?
Could you please explain this a bit further.

[snip]

+int populate(struct container_subsys *ss, struct container *cont)
+LL=none
+
+Called after creation of a container to allow a subsystem to populate
+the container directory with file entries.  The subsystem should make
+calls to container_add_file() with objects of type cftype (see
+include/linux/container.h for details).  Note that although this
+method can return an error code, the error code is currently not
+always handled well.

We needed the equivalent of container_remove_file() to be called
if container_add_file() failed.

[snip]


+struct container {
+	unsigned long flags;		/* "unsigned long" so bitops work */
+
+	/* count users of this container. >0 means busy, but doesn't
+	 * necessarily indicate the number of tasks in the
+	 * container */
+	atomic_t count;
+
+	/*
+	 * We link our 'sibling' struct into our parent's 'children'.
+	 * Our children link their 'sibling' into our 'children'.
+	 */
+	struct list_head sibling;	/* my parent's children */
+	struct list_head children;	/* my children */
+
+	struct container *parent;	/* my parent */
+	struct dentry *dentry;	  	/* container fs entry */
+
+	/* Private pointers for each registered subsystem */
+	struct container_subsys_state *subsys[CONTAINER_SUBSYS_COUNT];
+
+	struct containerfs_root *root;
+	struct container *top_container;
+};

Can't we derive the top_container from containerfs_root?

+
+/* struct cftype:
+ *
+ * The files in the container filesystem mostly have a very simple read/write
+ * handling, some common function will take care of it. Nevertheless some cases
+ * (read tasks) are special and therefore I define this structure for every
+ * kind of file.
+ *
+ *
+ * When reading/writing to a file:
+ *	- the container to use in file->f_dentry->d_parent->d_fsdata
+ *	- the 'cftype' of the file is file->f_dentry->d_fsdata
+ */
+
+struct inode;
+#define MAX_CFTYPE_NAME 64
+struct cftype {
+	/* By convention, the name should begin with the name of the
+	 * subsystem, followed by a period */
+	char name[MAX_CFTYPE_NAME];
+	int private;
+	int (*open) (struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
+	ssize_t (*read) (struct container *cont, struct cftype *cft,
+			 struct file *file,
+			 char __user *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t *ppos);
+	u64 (*read_uint) (struct container *cont, struct cftype *cft);

Is this a new callback, a specialization of the read() callback?

+	ssize_t (*write) (struct container *cont, struct cftype *cft,
+			  struct file *file,
+			  const char __user *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t *ppos);
+	int (*release) (struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
+};
+

[snip]

--
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux