On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 16:20 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: [snip] > Mel's moveable-zone work. > > I don't believe that this has had sufficient review and I'm sure that it > hasn't had sufficient third-party testing. Most of the approbations thus far > have consisted of people liking the overall idea, based on the changelogs and > multi-year-old discussions. > > For such a large and core change I'd have expected more detailed reviewing > effort and more third-party testing. And I STILL haven't made time to review > the code in detail myself. [snip] I am a fan of this, but I hadn't really realized that it's in -mm, and that it has to be enabled with kernelcore= Now that I am, I'm running it on my laptop with kernelcore=256M (it wouldn't boot with 128M or less, weird initscript errors and OOMs). 1 GB single-core laptops are probably not the intended test audience :) But I'll see what happens. -- Zan Lynx <[email protected]>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI MMCONFIG: add validation against ACPI motherboard resources
- Next by Date: Looking for linux-kernel archive in mbox format
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: mm-more-rmap-checking
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: mm-detach_vmas_to_be_unmapped-fix
- Index(es):
 |