Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments

On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 17:07 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> For clarity, if it fits, I prefer that one, too.

I don't think that was under question, was it?
My point was that I prefer it even when it _doesn't_ fit.

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: utrace comments
    • From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
  • condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
    • From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
  • Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
  • Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [3/3] use vmalloc() to arrange guard pages for stacks
• Next by Date: Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.
• Previous by thread: Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
• Next by thread: Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]