On Tue, 01 May 2007 09:11:18 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > add-pfn_valid_within-helper-for-sub-max_order-hole-detection.patch
> > anti-fragmentation-switch-over-to-pfn_valid_within.patch
> > lumpy-move-to-using-pfn_valid_within.patch
> >
> > More Mel things, and linkage between Mel-things and lumpy reclaim. It's here
> > where the patch ordering gets into a mess and things won't improve if
> > moveable-zones and lumpy-reclaim get deferred. Such a deferral would limit my
> > ability to queue more MM changes for 2.6.23.
>
> The first of these is really a cleanup and should slide into the stack
> before Mobility and Lumpy. The other two should then join their
> respective stacks anti-fragmentation-... to Mobility and lumpy-... to
> Lumpy. I would not expect them to increase linkage that way.
>
yup, that improved things a bit, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
