rct wrote:
> Apologies to all concerned for an unfortunate delay in resolving this.
> (...)
> I'll go retrieve a more conservatively-configured source tree (closer to
> what DSL-N uses) and start over...
Success with the Debian 2.6.18-4-486 build, which is known to work
almost as well on the test platform as the 2.6.12 kernel that DSL-N
comes with. I used an older compiler than Debian used for their
production build, so I binary-patched the aha1542.ko and sr_mod.ko
files so insmod wouldn't complain about different vermagic strings.
That's as close as it gets without redoing everything from scratch.
I'll give Alan's and James' patches a go within the next 13 hours.
(Alan: what *else* would you name a variable associated with a bounce
buffer besides Zebedee? Thanks for the occasion to smile...)
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy WTO + WIPO = DMCA? http://www.anti-dmca.org
[email protected]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
