Re: SMB2 file system - should it be a distinct module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steve French wrote:

...we need to decide whether the kernel
implementation of SMB2 client should be a distinct module or just part
of the cifs.ko module.

<snip>

My guess is that less than 1/3 of the cifs module would overlap - but
that overlap is enough that it would be easier to do smb2 as part of
cifs (although it would make the cifs module somewhat larger).

What about pulling out the common code into a helper module, which can then be used by both cifs and smb2?

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux