Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments

[Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>]

Satyam Sharma wrote:
[...]
> The rationale is to make the operator prominent and thus make
> the structure of a complex multi-line compound conditional expression more
> readable and obvious at first glance itself. For example, consider:
> 
>     if (veryverylengthycondition1 &&
>         smallcond2 &&
>         (conditionnumber3a ||
>         condition3b)) {
>         ...
>     }
> 
> versus
> 
>     if (veryverylengthycondition1
>         && smallcond2
>         && (conditionnumber3a
>             || condition3b)) {
>         ...
>     }
> 
> ?
> 
> Latter wins, doesn't it?

I find the latter more sensible too, even though I used the former
myself until recently (because I didn't knew better).
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=-= ----=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/