Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:42:44AM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
 > On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
 > 
 > > it's just a prototype, so no code is generated by declaring one
 > > to an unused (or even non-existant) function.
 > > 
 > > Or are you using some oddball compiler that warns about this?
 > > 
 > 
 > If you consider gcc to be oddball, yes.

what version ? Mine doesn't seem to warn on that.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions
    • From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 26/32] xen: Add Xen virtual block device driver.
• Next by Date: Re: [4/6] go BUG on vmallocspace in __pa() (was: Re: [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default)
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]