Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments

On Apr 30 2007 10:09, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>This is
>
>	if (expr1 &&
>		expr2)
>
>versus
>
>	if (expr1
>		&& expr2)
>
>the former is more common and is, IMO, more readable.
>
>The latter can be handy sometimes to prevent an 80-col overflow in the
>first line.

But reads like you would be trying to put
a \ on the expr2 line before expr2 :-/


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: utrace comments
    • From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
  • condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 9p: create separate 9p client interface
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386: introduce voyager smp_ops, fix voyager build
• Previous by thread: Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
• Next by thread: Re: condingstyle, was Re: utrace comments
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]