Re: [PATCH] [1/1] CPU-i386-Geode: Chipset access macros do not work as expected

Juergen Beisert <[email protected]> writes:

> From: Juergen Beisert <[email protected]>
> 
> Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions.
> With the macros a line like this fails (and does nothing):
> 	setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88);
> With inlined functions this line will work as expected.

Why do the macros not work? 

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] [1/1] CPU-i386-Geode: Chipset access macros do not work as expected
    • From: Juergen Beisert <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: BAD_SG_DMA panic in aha1542
• Next by Date: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] [1/1] CPU-i386-Geode: Chipset access macros do not work as expected
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [1/1] CPU-i386-Geode: Chipset access macros do not work as expected
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]