Re: [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu

On Monday 30 April 2007 13:16:42 Jan Kiszka wrote:
> There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and
> none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here.
> Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops.

Both patches added thanks
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu
  - From: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 04/36] Use menuconfig objects II - block devices
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [39/40] i386: Export paravirt_ops for non GPL modules too
Previous by thread: [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu
Next by thread: [KJ][PATCH] i386: white space fixes in i387.h
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]