Re: [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu

On Monday 30 April 2007 13:16:42 Jan Kiszka wrote:
> There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and
> none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here.
> Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops.

Both patches added thanks
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu
    • From: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 04/36] Use menuconfig objects II - block devices
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] [39/40] i386: Export paravirt_ops for non GPL modules too
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu
• Next by thread: [KJ][PATCH] i386: white space fixes in i387.h
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]